WASHINGTON (Reuters) -After the U.S. Supreme Court used a conservative legal principle called the "major questions" doctrine ...
The Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday over whether a federal emergency powers law authorizes President Trump's most ...
The Supreme Court’s questioning of the use of a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on scores of countries raised doubt ...
The Supreme Court will decide whether President Trump’s sweeping global tariffs are legal in a case with major consequences ...
Oregon, other states and businesses argued the International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not give the president ...
The Trump administration argued that the president had the authority to issue sweeping tariffs under a law reserved for use ...
N O SITTING PRESIDENT has ever attended an oral argument at the Supreme Court. That is one precedent Donald Trump chose not ...
In its biggest case of the term, the Supreme Court will decide whether Trump can impose sweeping tariffs on nearly every ...
The window of opportunity to limit global warming to 1.5°C is closing. Here’s how countries can be held to account with ...
The ICJ is not a proper court of law, but rather a “partisan political tool,” as the U.S. State Department has described it.The post How the UN’s International Court of ...
The International Court of Justice ruled Wednesday that Israel, as an occupying power, must allow United Nations humanitarian aid into Gaza and may not use starvation as a method of warfare. In its ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback