Every Supreme Court decision is important to the parties involved, but only a handful have so much impact, and such a powerful story, that someone makes a movie about it. And one such case is “Kelo v.

In Kelo v. City of New London (2005), the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the government to condemn property and transfer it to other private owners in the name of "economic development." Upholding the ...

In dissenting to the majority's 2005 decision in Kelo allowing the taking of a house owned by Susette Kelo by the city government of New London, Connecticut to transfer it to a favored developer, ...

As Bernick recognizes, the interesting aspect of Purdy's article is not so much what it says about my book but the way it reflects a particular type of left-liberal attitude towards judicial ...

Paul J. Larkin is a senior legal research fellow in the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at The Heritage Foundation. Read his research. Elijah Coryell is a member of the Young Leaders ...

The Supreme Court’s Kelo 5-4 decision leaves compensation the only remaining protection of private property. No property ownership is secure any longer if a private developer can convince an eminent ...

On June 23, 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court said the city of New London, Conn., could take Susette Kelo’s house. A city-sponsored agency had a plan for condos, a hotel and research labs for Pfizer Inc., ...

Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights. I write on the damage big government does, especially to education. Jul 09, 2015, 04:00pm EDT Jul 09, 2015, 04:44pm EDT This ...

This report is another in a continuing series on the aftermath of Supreme Court decisions. This post involves developments on the one-year anniversary of Kelo v. New London. President Bush on Friday ...

PLC's Coca X Ingredient Powers KéLó Beverages, the Official Hydration Partner of the National Lacrosse League (NLL) in the United States. TORONTO, Nov. 25, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Power Leaves Corp. ...