The Supreme Court expressed strong concerns on Monday about the sweep of state laws restricting how large social media companies moderate user content.

And the Supreme Court's own analysis here backs the tech groups' position that social media platforms are engaged in protected expression when they decide what content to allow and how to present it.

Social media platforms commonly use artificial intelligence for content moderation, with the AI software itself relying on algorithms to screen content posted by social media users.

Teachers warn that social media is driving an increase in knife crime among students, highlighting safety concerns in schools ...

Most people want harmful social media content such as physical threats and defamation to be restricted. This also applies in the USA where several social media platforms have recently modified ...

The move, which will affect several hundreds out of a workforce of about 2,500 in the country, comes as other social-media ...

The Supreme Court’s decision on social media content moderation could expand protections for tech platforms under the First Amendment.

A proposed Missouri rule would give social media users a choice over their algorithm, potentially affecting what they would see and share on social media platforms.

Social Media Social Media Moderation Is Speech, Says Supreme Court The Court is remanding these two cases for more analysis—but it made its views on some key issues clear.